|
The Association of Members of
IBM UK Pension Plans (AMIPP) |
| AMIPP repeats its "No Windup" assessment. (This page updated 24 Sept 2004) |
|
This page has been instigated by
a series of media stories speculating on IBM's pension intentions.
Below is the response by IBM and
by pensions administration to enquiries prompted by the media. (AMIPP
does not know of any response from the Trustee). The response is
interleaved with AMIPP's comments in green.
The response, which has been issued many times to both employees and
retirees, reads:
Pensions Policy is a matter for the IBM Company HR
department, rather than Pensions Trust.
"Pensions Trust"
is a reference to IBM UK Pensions Trust Ltd, the enterprise run by the
trustee-directors; there is no other trust.
On any assessment of the potential, the statement is simply untrue. The speculation is about windup and the Trust has the power to windup the scheme, just as the company has. (Although neither will do so.) Only the Trust has power to amend the Deeds (although it needs approval for its proposals from the company). For all proposed amendments, the Trust has to decide whether they meet the requirements of the regulations with respect to protecting members' rights. What this sentence actually says is that the Trust has a history of following company goals rather than scheme member protection and as a result pensions policy has been solely a matter for IBM.
Rather than forward on your note to HR for a response,
we have received the following comment from Dave Heath, HR Director,
which I am pleased to be able to send to you.
Statement from David Heath. Last week, there was some media speculation that IBM is considering winding up its C Plan pension scheme. As you know, IBM does not comment in the media on rumour and speculation. It may be helpful however to draw your attention to a statement contained in the most recent IBM Pension Members Report, where the Trustee Chairman Jim Lamb commented:
AMIPP has not seen
the the terminology "IBM Pension Members Report" used before but the
quote is from the 2003 Members' Report. Probably "IBM Pension Plan
2003 Members' Report" was intended since that is the title on the
document.
"...the Company has confirmed to the Trustee that it remains the Company's current intention to continue to support the Plan through the payment of employer contributions in accordance with the provisions of the governing Trust Deed and Rules. The Trustee has welcomed this positive confirmation from the Company."
This statement is
not helpful because it is not relevant. A current intention is not
relevant because it may not be the intention tomorrow and the
speculation is about the future. An intention to pay according to the
provisions (which might be changed) is not relevant because the
speculation is not about whether IBM will behave legally, it is about
whether the scheme's provisions will be changed.
AMIPP has commented before that if the
Trustee welcomed such an inadequate statement of support for our
schemes it was wrong to do so.
David Heath UK Director of Human Resources It is to be expected that David Heath would be used as the spokesman but with the deficit running around £1 billion most IBMers will know that any decisions of this magnitude are made by the Corporation rather than by the UK directors.
Other companies do
issue denials of scenarios that are known to be impractical. Other
companies do offer reassurance about the forseeable future. Other
companies commit to funding objectives above the legal minimum.
The surge of interest by the scheme membership offered an opportunity
to communicate with the members in a respectful way rather than
fostering fear, uncertainty and doubt. It is an opportunity missed.
|
| Back to: Home Page |