Archive 6 of IBM UK's radical downgrade :  AMIPP Forums (Message Boards) The fastest message board... ever.
of its pension provision. YOU CAN NO LONGER POST HERE! This is now an archive 
Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement.
Posted by: ImGone (IP Logged)
Date: 15 February 2014 12:07PM

It is always possible to refer it to the Pensions Ombudsman and/or Pensions Regulator.

If necessary, they can replace the Trustees and take over running of the Pension Scheme - something I think would allow all of us to sleep more soundly at night.



Subject Views Written By Posted
  Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 3254 Eddy 07 February 2014 10:39PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1502 ImGone 08 February 2014 11:35AM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1398 Mad Dog 09 February 2014 05:52PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1655 Eddy 09 February 2014 08:26PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1279 Mad Dog 10 February 2014 12:07AM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1369 Eddy 10 February 2014 07:47AM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1931 CeeGee 11 February 2014 04:13PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1289 Eddy 10 February 2014 04:16PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1297 Mad Dog 10 February 2014 05:44PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1269 Eddy 11 February 2014 08:43AM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1189 Mad Dog 11 February 2014 06:52PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1168 Eddy 11 February 2014 05:57PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1135 Mad Dog 11 February 2014 06:44PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1158 Ace Buzz 11 February 2014 07:14PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1261 Mad Dog 11 February 2014 07:34PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1225 CeeGee 11 February 2014 09:49PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1349 Ace Buzz 12 February 2014 06:21AM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1328 CeeGee 12 February 2014 03:06PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1203 CeeGee 24 February 2014 08:05AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM sidesteps first court judgement. 1465 Eddy 11 February 2014 10:15PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM sidesteps first court judgement. 1412 thoms 12 February 2014 07:22AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM sidesteps first court judgement. 1240 ImGone 12 February 2014 05:01PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM sidesteps first court judgement. 1255 Mad Dog 12 February 2014 05:21PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1287 Eddy 12 February 2014 05:40PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1217 Mad Dog 12 February 2014 05:48PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1220 Eddy 12 February 2014 05:59PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1194 jerry 12 February 2014 08:56PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1237 Slide Rule 12 February 2014 09:13PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1207 Mad Dog 12 February 2014 09:47PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1443 Anonymous User 13 February 2014 09:21AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1192 Slide Rule 13 February 2014 10:32AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1233 scunnered 13 February 2014 10:40AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1248 Anonymous User 13 February 2014 11:11AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1182 Mad Dog 14 February 2014 04:09PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1292 GrumpyGuts 13 February 2014 08:15AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1470 Mad Dog 13 February 2014 09:33AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1227 GrumpyGuts 13 February 2014 09:39AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1441 Mad Dog 13 February 2014 10:53AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1295 blaster 14 February 2014 03:19PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1281 CeeGee 14 February 2014 07:23PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1169 scunnered 17 February 2014 03:08PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1194 growingold 14 February 2014 08:57PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1267 Eddy 15 February 2014 07:51AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1248 Ace Buzz 15 February 2014 08:51AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1214 ImGone 15 February 2014 12:07PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1172 Mike Eacott 15 February 2014 11:44AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1209 dave 16 February 2014 08:54AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1253 Mad Dog 16 February 2014 09:30AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1243 dave 16 February 2014 10:55AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1191 goner 16 February 2014 06:59PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1288 dave 16 February 2014 10:45PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1267 Ace Buzz 17 February 2014 07:21AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1189 goner 17 February 2014 05:10PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1280 dave 17 February 2014 09:54PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1279 ImGone 18 February 2014 11:34AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1256 itsnotthe companyIjoined 18 February 2014 12:14PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1299 Mike Eacott 18 February 2014 12:55PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1261 JACK05 18 February 2014 02:55PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1303 Anonymous User 18 February 2014 05:14PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1388 ImGone 19 February 2014 02:05PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1316 dave 18 February 2014 03:32PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1303 Eddy 24 February 2014 10:55AM


Sorry, you do not have permission to post/reply in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.