Archive 6 of IBM UK's radical downgrade :  AMIPP Forums (Message Boards) The fastest message board... ever.
of its pension provision. YOU CAN NO LONGER POST HERE! This is now an archive 
Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement.
Posted by: Slide Rule (IP Logged)
Date: 13 February 2014 10:32AM

If you want to move this forward now I would have thought the first step would be to list all the issues and ask the pension trustees in writing for an explanation. That is what a lawyer would do first but at great cost to you.



Subject Views Written By Posted
  Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 3209 Eddy 07 February 2014 10:39PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1473 ImGone 08 February 2014 11:35AM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1374 Mad Dog 09 February 2014 05:52PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1631 Eddy 09 February 2014 08:26PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1253 Mad Dog 10 February 2014 12:07AM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1317 Eddy 10 February 2014 07:47AM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1910 CeeGee 11 February 2014 04:13PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1262 Eddy 10 February 2014 04:16PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1273 Mad Dog 10 February 2014 05:44PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1245 Eddy 11 February 2014 08:43AM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1161 Mad Dog 11 February 2014 06:52PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1145 Eddy 11 February 2014 05:57PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1110 Mad Dog 11 February 2014 06:44PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1133 Ace Buzz 11 February 2014 07:14PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1235 Mad Dog 11 February 2014 07:34PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1200 CeeGee 11 February 2014 09:49PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1318 Ace Buzz 12 February 2014 06:21AM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1304 CeeGee 12 February 2014 03:06PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1179 CeeGee 24 February 2014 08:05AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM sidesteps first court judgement. 1439 Eddy 11 February 2014 10:15PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM sidesteps first court judgement. 1388 thoms 12 February 2014 07:22AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM sidesteps first court judgement. 1217 ImGone 12 February 2014 05:01PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM sidesteps first court judgement. 1232 Mad Dog 12 February 2014 05:21PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1263 Eddy 12 February 2014 05:40PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1193 Mad Dog 12 February 2014 05:48PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1198 Eddy 12 February 2014 05:59PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1170 jerry 12 February 2014 08:56PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1205 Slide Rule 12 February 2014 09:13PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1182 Mad Dog 12 February 2014 09:47PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1420 Anonymous User 13 February 2014 09:21AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1169 Slide Rule 13 February 2014 10:32AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1198 scunnered 13 February 2014 10:40AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1220 Anonymous User 13 February 2014 11:11AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1158 Mad Dog 14 February 2014 04:09PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1268 GrumpyGuts 13 February 2014 08:15AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1443 Mad Dog 13 February 2014 09:33AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1205 GrumpyGuts 13 February 2014 09:39AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1417 Mad Dog 13 February 2014 10:53AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1267 blaster 14 February 2014 03:19PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1258 CeeGee 14 February 2014 07:23PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1140 scunnered 17 February 2014 03:08PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1165 growingold 14 February 2014 08:57PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1238 Eddy 15 February 2014 07:51AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1217 Ace Buzz 15 February 2014 08:51AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1188 ImGone 15 February 2014 12:07PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1146 Mike Eacott 15 February 2014 11:44AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1188 dave 16 February 2014 08:54AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1225 Mad Dog 16 February 2014 09:30AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1215 dave 16 February 2014 10:55AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1166 goner 16 February 2014 06:59PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1262 dave 16 February 2014 10:45PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1245 Ace Buzz 17 February 2014 07:21AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1156 goner 17 February 2014 05:10PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1244 dave 17 February 2014 09:54PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1257 ImGone 18 February 2014 11:34AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1230 itsnotthe companyIjoined 18 February 2014 12:14PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1273 Mike Eacott 18 February 2014 12:55PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1239 JACK05 18 February 2014 02:55PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1282 Anonymous User 18 February 2014 05:14PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1368 ImGone 19 February 2014 02:05PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1286 dave 18 February 2014 03:32PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1274 Eddy 24 February 2014 10:55AM


Sorry, you do not have permission to post/reply in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.