Archive 6 of IBM UK's radical downgrade :  AMIPP Forums (Message Boards) The fastest message board... ever.
of its pension provision. YOU CAN NO LONGER POST HERE! This is now an archive 
Re: Pension Statements - IBM sidesteps first court judgement.
Posted by: ImGone (IP Logged)
Date: 12 February 2014 05:01PM

That is what I was thinking - that "hybrid" deferred is not the same as deferred and it is this that IBM claims allows them to not increase the pension. This may be something that, if you group together, you can challenge via the courts (or perhaps more cheaply refer it to the Ombudsman).

It seems to me that 60 is the retirement age that IBM are promoting - you get the "statutory" underpin and no ERDF - is this age discrimination ?



Subject Views Written By Posted
  Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 3254 Eddy 07 February 2014 10:39PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1502 ImGone 08 February 2014 11:35AM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1399 Mad Dog 09 February 2014 05:52PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1655 Eddy 09 February 2014 08:26PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1279 Mad Dog 10 February 2014 12:07AM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1369 Eddy 10 February 2014 07:47AM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1931 CeeGee 11 February 2014 04:13PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1289 Eddy 10 February 2014 04:16PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1297 Mad Dog 10 February 2014 05:44PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1269 Eddy 11 February 2014 08:43AM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1189 Mad Dog 11 February 2014 06:52PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1168 Eddy 11 February 2014 05:57PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1135 Mad Dog 11 February 2014 06:44PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1158 Ace Buzz 11 February 2014 07:14PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1261 Mad Dog 11 February 2014 07:34PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1225 CeeGee 11 February 2014 09:49PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1349 Ace Buzz 12 February 2014 06:21AM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1328 CeeGee 12 February 2014 03:06PM
  Re: Pension Statements - A strange CPI Issue 1203 CeeGee 24 February 2014 08:05AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM sidesteps first court judgement. 1465 Eddy 11 February 2014 10:15PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM sidesteps first court judgement. 1412 thoms 12 February 2014 07:22AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM sidesteps first court judgement. 1240 ImGone 12 February 2014 05:01PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM sidesteps first court judgement. 1255 Mad Dog 12 February 2014 05:21PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1287 Eddy 12 February 2014 05:40PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1217 Mad Dog 12 February 2014 05:48PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1220 Eddy 12 February 2014 05:59PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1194 jerry 12 February 2014 08:56PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1237 Slide Rule 12 February 2014 09:13PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1207 Mad Dog 12 February 2014 09:47PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1443 Anonymous User 13 February 2014 09:21AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1192 Slide Rule 13 February 2014 10:32AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1233 scunnered 13 February 2014 10:40AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1248 Anonymous User 13 February 2014 11:11AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1182 Mad Dog 14 February 2014 04:09PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1292 GrumpyGuts 13 February 2014 08:15AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1470 Mad Dog 13 February 2014 09:33AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1227 GrumpyGuts 13 February 2014 09:39AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1441 Mad Dog 13 February 2014 10:53AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1295 blaster 14 February 2014 03:19PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1281 CeeGee 14 February 2014 07:23PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1169 scunnered 17 February 2014 03:08PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1194 growingold 14 February 2014 08:57PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1267 Eddy 15 February 2014 07:51AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1248 Ace Buzz 15 February 2014 08:51AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1215 ImGone 15 February 2014 12:07PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1172 Mike Eacott 15 February 2014 11:44AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1209 dave 16 February 2014 08:54AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1253 Mad Dog 16 February 2014 09:30AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1243 dave 16 February 2014 10:55AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1191 goner 16 February 2014 06:59PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1288 dave 16 February 2014 10:45PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1267 Ace Buzz 17 February 2014 07:21AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1189 goner 17 February 2014 05:10PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1280 dave 17 February 2014 09:54PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1279 ImGone 18 February 2014 11:34AM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1256 itsnotthe companyIjoined 18 February 2014 12:14PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1299 Mike Eacott 18 February 2014 12:55PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1261 JACK05 18 February 2014 02:55PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1303 Anonymous User 18 February 2014 05:14PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1388 ImGone 19 February 2014 02:05PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1316 dave 18 February 2014 03:32PM
  Re: Pension Statements - IBM interpretation of first court judgement. 1303 Eddy 24 February 2014 10:55AM


Sorry, you do not have permission to post/reply in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.