Business/Financial Desk
| March 20,
2003, Thursday
Sprint Settles Suits With Policy Shift And $50 Million
By PATRICK
McGEEHAN (NYT) 815 words
Late Edition -
Final , Section C , Page 1 , Column 5
ABSTRACT
- Sprint Corp agrees to
several changes in governance, including how its directors are
chosen and when its executives can sell shares; changes are part of
settlement of lawsuits filed by Sprint shareholders over company's
unusual treatment of executive stock options during scuttled
mergers; Sprint agrees to pay $50 million to shareholders to settle
one suit, class action filed in federal court in Kansas City, Kan;
says most of that amount will be covered by insurance; Robert Monks,
shareholder advocate who advised plaintiffs in second suit, says
Sprint agrees to changes that would make its board more independent
and more accountable; Amalgamated Bank, which is owned by labor
unions and holds about 600,000 shares of Sprint, filed suit in
Missouri; Sprint's directors will stand for election every year
starting next year, instead of every three years; two-thirds of them
must meet tougher standard of independence and one independent
director will serve as lead director (M) In a legal settlement that
may signal that the battleground for corporate reform has shifted to
the courts, the Sprint Corporation said yesterday that it had agreed
to several changes in governance, including how its directors are
chosen and when its executives can sell shares.
The changes were part of a settlement of lawsuits filed by Sprint
shareholders over the company's unusual treatment of executive stock
options during a scuttled merger, according to a plaintiff and his
lawyer. Sprint said it had agreed to pay $50 million to shareholders
to settle one suit, a class action filed in federal court in Kansas
City, Kan. Sprint, based in Overland Park, Kan., said most of that
amount would be covered by insurance.
|