Re: Trustee meetings

Posted by Pearly Gates [R] on 12 October 2004 at 01:30:05:

In Reply to: Re: Trustee meetings posted by Dave Mitchell on 11 October 2004 at 19:35:26:

I am sure that what you say is true. But your investment decisions would be a whole lot easier if IBM had paid its promised share (that is, had not taken a decade-long "pension holiday") and had not used a temporary "surplus" (aka reserve) to fund its payments to the M plan.

What steps are being taken to demand that IBM makes good the deficit which was largely caused by IBM not making the promised payments?

I would have thought a formal motion by an MED (even though it will be defeated) demanding such restitution would put an important marker down.

Has this been done?