Posted by David Day
on 09 October 2000 at 19:19:05:
There is a long(ish) article in the current edition of 'Private Eye',
Oct 6th. #1012, which suggests that BA is busy 'manipulating' it's
pension fund in a very similar way to IBM(UK) Ltd. It involves fund
surpluses, introduction of new schemes and pension holidays for BA. They
have already had a'day in court' and now have a full High Court hearing
scheduled for Jan. 15th. next year.
See: Clippings
from "Private Eye"
Posted by Jim Gilchrist
on 09 October 2000 at 23:49:48:
In Reply to: ..and
British Airways too. posted by David Day on 09 October 2000 at
19:19:05:
Is it more than a disconnected coincidence that the IBM Pension Trust
has the CEO of BA Pensions Investment Management Ltd as a director?
Also from the Times on 30 September ....
Captain Mike Post is one of a group of disaffected members of the
older plan, the Airways Pension Scheme (APS), who object to its merger
with the New Airways Pension Scheme (NAPS). BA says the merger will
generate more surplus to improve benefits and fund a contribution
holiday from the NAPS.
The rebel members say their scheme's substantial surplus should stand
apart from the NAPS to improve their benefits. Captain Post and his
fellow campaigners are taking their battle all the way to the High
Court. The hearing is on January 15.
).
Posted by Derek Wright on 26 October 2000 at 10:38:10:
In Reply to: ..and
British Airways too. posted by David Day on 09 October 2000 at
19:19:05:
Todays London Times (26 Oct 00) on page 26 has an articled titled "BA
faces pensions merger climbdown" - The actuary of the fund has informed
the Funds trustees that "changing financial circumstances means that
they should no longer go ahead with the merger in the current form,
according to sources close to the scheme"
Posted by Alan Murphy on
01 November 2000 at 23:58:41:
The current edition of "Private Eye" (3rd November, umber 1014)
contains an item about the British Airways pension fund. Here is a short
quote:
--------
Then on 20 October the trustees met, reinforced by Mike Post.
Unanimously they decided to do a smart about-turn. Previously they had
all been in favour of the merger. Now they were all against it. "The
trustees," said a statement, "will now be notifying BA that they do not
consider it appropriate to proceed with the merger."
--------
For more information see:
|