January 2001
Dear Pensioner,
This letter comes to you from the Elected Trustees of the Pension
Fund. We would have preferred it to have been from the full Board of
trustees, but IBM's appointed trustees would not agree to the wording.
They apparently support the sentiments expressed, but did not want you
to know the full facts of the situation.
Last year the trustees of the IBM SA Pension Fund granted all
pensioners a full CPI "catchup" increase to pensions, back-dated to
1995, and agreed on a minimum pension equal to the State Pension. A CPI
"catchup" is the term used to bring all pensions up to where they would
have been if they had been given every year since the last catchup in
1995. The increase is worth about an additional 15% on your current
pension. A minimum pension represents an amount of about R540 per month,
which would affect about 10% of our pensioners.
In addition to the above improvements in benefits, the trustees
agreed on a full CPI increase, effective 1 January 2001. This increase
means a further 6.8% on to your pension. These measures have been
negotiated on the Board for the last 18 months and would have gone a
long way in alleviating the critical cost of living crisis in which most
of our pensioners find themselves. Many of you would agree with us that,
in order to maintain the purchasing power of our pensions, we would need
about 12-17% increase every year.
Regrettably, though not unexpectedly, IBM SA, who, according to the
Rules of the Fund have to consent to all decisions of the Board,
disallowed all three of the above benefits. No reasons were given for
rejecting the CPI catchup. They said that the minimum pension was under
review. On the January 2001 CPI increase, they declined the 6.8% granted
by the Board and stated that they would allow only 4.566%, which is
2/3rds of the amount granted by the Board. This alteration of a decision
agreed by the full Board is most irregular and is not provided for in
the Rules of the Fund, and will be addressed by us at the next trustee
meeting on February 8 .
As the notification of the increase was received by the Fund only 2
weeks ago, it would not have been in your January pension payment
anyway. We hope it will be included in your February pension. We
continue to address the problem of IBM's interference in the operation
of our Fund, their refusal to allow reasonable benefit improvements to
members, their failure to make contributions and payments into the Fund
as required by the Rules and their persistent attempts to remove assets
of the Fund which do not belong to it. The founders of our Fund, who
include Morris Cowley and Jack Clarke have over the years repeatedly
assured us that the Fund's sole purpose is to provide pensions to IBMers,
to maintain the purchasing power of the pensions, and that the assets
could not be used for any other purpose.
We intend to keep you well informed on all actions being taken on
Fund matters. For more information about the Fund, see our Website at
zasection.html
We are all available to discuss Fund matters.
Regards, Bruno Ganter,
Rudi Goldschmidt,
Ian Murdoch,
Roger Hull and
Olev Taim
|